Saw this new bill introduced in Springfield:
Orders of protectionPublic Act 95-234 (Fritchey, D-Chicago; Haine, D-Alton) authorizes a judge to include protecting animals as part of an order of protection. Effective Jan. 1, 2008.
I admit I'm sort of anti-pet personally, but isn't this taking things a bit too far?
Orders of protectionPublic Act 95-234 (Fritchey, D-Chicago; Haine, D-Alton) authorizes a judge to include protecting animals as part of an order of protection. Effective Jan. 1, 2008.
I admit I'm sort of anti-pet personally, but isn't this taking things a bit too far?